Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multihousing Professional magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. SoWhy 12:05, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multihousing Professional magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable magazine; a search reveals zero coverage in independent reliable sources. A7 was declined by SoWhy. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:55, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:55, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do think you should mention that I declined it solely because WP:A7 does not cover magazines. Regards SoWhy 14:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There are serious violations of WP:COI and WP:PAID happening in this article involving the sockpuppet accounts, LindaHoffman (talk · contribs), ASNicks (talk · contribs), and MHPmag (talk · contribs). --Yamla (talk) 20:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.