Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multisensory analysis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Multisensory analysis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sourced to probably a predatory journal [the signs are there]. Even if this were notable WP:TNT would apply. Whatever is good can be merged into Sensory analysis. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:48, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 00:11, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Headbomb, I'm confused what you're proposing here? Deletion per lack of notability/TNT, or merging. They are two different things. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC):[reply]
• Delete none of the content seems to be related to the one source. I'm not sure how it's supposed to be different from Sensory analysis, so a redirect there is fine, I guess. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:45, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.