Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musa Paik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:02, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Musa Paik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Badly formatted orphan article that makes a claim of notability, but does not provide any sources that fulfil WP:N. In all honesty, this looks like an article that was created as an advertisement and has somehow slipped by multiple admins for the past six years. MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 07:59, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note - The user that created this article was blocked six years ago for spamming/advertising. --MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 08:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as it stands - David Gerard (talk) 19:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:PROMO; strictily advertorial content and no indications of notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.