Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Musea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. I cannot find any useful sources with WP:BEFORE. It has been flagged as needing them since 2014 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 23:34, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 23:34, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 23:34, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France—-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:40, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — SIRS isn’t satisfied thus NCORP is automatically not met. Celestina007 (talk) 01:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom's mention of references being needed for that long of a time frame. If they were out there, they probably would have been found at this point. If they do exist, the article can be recreated with them, but as it is now, the subject is not notable and has not been proven to be notable. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 20:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.