Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music Information Retrieval Evaluation eXchange

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to International Society for Music Information Retrieval#MIREX. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:47, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Music Information Retrieval Evaluation eXchange

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability in doubt. Leyo 12:32, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- I did find this. GAB^Hello! 16:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 20:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to International Society for Music Information Retrieval#MIREX, where it is mentioned. I was unable to find independent reliable sources for this periodic event at the ISMIR conference. The source mentioned by GAB is reliable, but not independent; J. Stephen Downie manages MIREX [1]. Basic facts about the event are verifiable, hence I recommend a merge of just the lead and references to conference article itself. --Mark viking (talk) 23:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge also as none of this actually suggests a better independently notable article. SwisterTwister talk 05:10, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.