Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim unity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Angr (talk) 18:28, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim unity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It looks like somebodys mouthpiece and there is . Can you redirect it somewhere? Swingoswingo (talk) 08:36, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing to be salvaged here for considering a selective merge or redirect to any other article. WP:!. Harsh (talk) 13:15, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Certainly parts of the article are not objective, but the article is by no means devoid of useful content as Harsh claims. (I'd say that roughly the firts half is OK & the second half should go. As for "no significance of the term Muslim unity", nonsense. The topic is clearly a notable one: note that there is a Muslim Unity Center in Michigan, for example.

Comment The "other stuff exists" argument isn't valid. Also, that article itself doesn't seem notable either. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:45, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable term. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 17:16, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This not only fails WP:GNG and comes off as soapbox-ing, but it also doesn't claim notability - it possibly could have been nominated for speedy. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:46, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although the term may be a valid phrase and potentially in common useage it isn't noteable on its own merits Amortias (T)(C) 23:20, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.