Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My 31st Demerit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:19, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My 31st Demerit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only a single feature article in Daily star. I failed to find any other source for this band in Google search. Fails WP:GNG Arr4 (talk) 14:03, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉ 19:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 2012 article with one source. They played one event, and nothing comes up in searches. AlbinoFerret 03:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - it would be nice to find out their name in Bengali to see if sufficient coverage is available. —Мандичка^YO 😜 01:32, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 00:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Bar the source in the article I can't find anything at all, No evidence of notability, Fails GNG/ –Davey2010^Talk 02:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I'm sure they're earnest, and they probably rock as hard as any, but it is the nature of bands to pass beyond the memory of man, like krill, and Wikipedia is neither a validation nor memorial of the widespread democratization of music production. Without more external validation, no. Hithladaeus (talk) 12:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.