Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Occurrence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. El Beeblerino ^{if you're not into the whole brevity thing} 23:37, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My Occurrence

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is just another poorly written episode article that is mainly plot with a small review section. These kind of articles might have been good 10 years ago, but new episode articles should need more to them than just a review section. Gonnym (talk) 21:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:25, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but you deleted half an article and then restored redirect saying it's mostly has plot.

The episode is often cited among the best Scrubs (TV) episodes, it has significant coverage.

"mainly plot with a small review section" - three paragraphs of plot, three paragraphs of reception. BilboBeggins (talk) 10:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Scrubs season 1#ep22. I'm usually in favor of keeping articles with only reviews as secondary coverage, but a single review in The A.V. Club and brief mentions in listicles such as IGN isn't enough. (This doesn't count as a significant review – my general rule of thumb is that sites or authors should have their own article to provide a significant review.) A redirect is best as episode titles are reasonable search terms. RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:17, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I of course have no problem with keeping the title as a redirect. Episode titles are always valid search terms. Gonnym (talk) 09:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep. There is enough significant coverage of episode in various reliable sources.

First, "article is mainly plot" was never valid argument for deletion, we need coverage. Second, it is now no longer true, the review section is roughly the same amount of words. BilboBeggins (talk) 17:11, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 22:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.