Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Trading Academy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 05:17, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My Trading Academy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Whatever this is, it fails WP:GNG. Adam9007 (talk) 22:38, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I myself would've considered speedy somehow and this itself has been tagged as such but unfortunately removed; nothing at all convincing the necessary improvements to keep. SwisterTwister talk 23:05, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nom should have saved us the trouble and left the speedy tag on - it's obviously promotional, and this entity has no claim to notability whatsoever, not even a far-fetched one. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:30, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems pretty NPOV to me. Adam9007 (talk) 23:36, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly self-promotional content created by the company's founder. Richard3120 (talk) 04:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a single reference. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As article is unreferenced, reads promotional, and probably should've been speedied under G13 or A7. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 23:14, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is entirely unreferenced and has a promotional tone. — Music1201 ^talk 01:17, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.