Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N.V.R Educational Institution
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus s that simply saying "keep per SCHOOLOUTCOMES" isn't enough and that editors are now expected to find a source for schools (that confirms its existence) otherwise they get deleted, In this case a source has been provided which obviously confirms the schools existence so closing as Keep (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 00:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
N.V.R Educational Institution
- N.V.R Educational Institution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't see any coverage by third-party sources and believe that this particular school does not meet the basic notability requirement. Pichpich (talk) 16:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Standard WP:DIRECTORY dumping. Primary schools are not inherently notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jergling (talk • contribs) 19:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - there is a claim that this has a secondary school branch, but I can't find any evidence of that. Bearian (talk) 20:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. It seems to be a secondary school. Their facebook page links to their website; where on clicking on drop-down menu (class) lists L.K.G. to 10th standard. Anup [Talk] 23:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as a secondary school is in fact acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 04:35, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.