Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NX Files (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 15:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NX Files (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I need editors' help to determine this video series' notability. Some of the references are dead, and I don't know whether the few ones that live are enough. I didn't find anything in WP:BEFORE search. Neocorelight (Talk) 23:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Canada. Neocorelight (Talk) 23:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment See also Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_NX_Files_characters for the character list. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Martial arts and Internet. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Arguments to keep in the last nomination were extremely low-quality and based on various notability and logical fallacies, mostly WP:ITSIMPORTANT and various kinds of appeal to emotion and ad hominem. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - When searching for sources for the current AFD for the character list, I was finding absolutely nothing on this series in reliable sources. What sources are present in the article are also pretty bad - most are not even really about the series or are not reliable sources. The extremely small amount of coverage it received seventeen years ago is not enough to pass the WP:GNG and it has received absolutely no coverage or reviews in reliable sources since then. Rorshacma (talk) 03:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not meet criteria for notability. Can't find sources to meet WP:SIGCOV. Lekkha Moun (talk) 04:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no reliable sources, terrible arguements last time, fails notability, etc. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Doesn't meet WP:GNG. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 22:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Sounds like a strong case for deletion. The lack of reliable sources WP:SIGCOV and issues with notability WP:GNG raise concerns about the article's factual basis and value. Waqar💬 18:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.