Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Na brzegu rzeki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 13:05, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Na brzegu rzeki

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NBOOK nor GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 14:06, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable author, Czesław Miłosz. The corresponding Polish-language article, [[:pl:Na brzegu rzeki[edytuj]], demonstrates the book's notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Eastmain: I've fixed your apparent mistake per WP:TPO. Your !vote was clear even without the word "keep", but without the last "'''" it looked like you were shouting your entire comment. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 03:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Eastmain. Satisfies criteria 5 of the guideline WP:NBOOK. The author, Czesław Miłosz, won a nobel prize for literature (and other important awards). James500 (talk) 06:15, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I would have said "redirect", regardless of notability and "potential" to become a worthwhile standalone article, since the article as of the most recent edit to this AFD included no information that wasn't already included in the main Miłosz (and per my comment here that is the opposite of what our inclusion policy and notability guidelines say), but I've just now remedied that problem myself. (Funny how "deletionist" editors like myself usually wind up being the ones to fix these articles to save them from deletion/redirection.) Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 03:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

for which you have received a kitten:)) Coolabahapple (talk) 08:52, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Another WP:NBOOKS #5 case. I've added two more sources that discuss themes and some particular poems. More could be written based on those and I'm sure there are more sources to be found in English and Polish (and Lithuanian?). Mortee (talk) 20:32, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:43, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.