Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naal Natchathiram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 01:53, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Naal Natchathiram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails Wikipedia:Notability (films). Both Filmibeat and Indiaglitz are unreliable per Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force#Guidelines on sources. The only content in this article is one of the supporting actresses saying that the film is good. DareshMohan (talk) 00:00, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Shellwood (talk) 00:29, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I cannot find sourcing online showing how this is notable. Is it possible there are references calling it something different or with a slight spelling variation? --CNMall41 (talk) 17:36, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Source 1,3 are unreliable WP:ICTFSOURCES and source 2 is just list of songs. No significant coverage to pass WP:NFILM. RangersRus (talk) 18:08, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It is unlikely that we will find much online coverage about this 2009 film because digital media was not as pervasive or mainstream as it is today. The sources Filmibeat and IndiaGlitz are not credible enough and mostly discuss the film's cast. Chanel Dsouza (talk) 12:39, 30 April 2025 (UT
• Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG and WP:NFILM.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:59, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete GNG requires more for notability. We should be able to find a better source with Google for GNG. Agnieszka653 (talk) 16:55, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not every single film is notable. Bearian (talk) 19:47, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.