Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nada al-Ahdal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Delete reasons need to be a lot better than that, Anyway like below there was an impact and all that so i don't believe BLP1E applies, IMHO I think relisting would simply gain more !Keeps so wrapping it up now/ (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 17:04, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nada al-Ahdal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Based on WP:BLP1E A m i t 웃 17:21, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. People who watch this video with 9 million views may be curious whether she was really killed: 11 Year Old Child Bride Speaks Out Before Being Killed. The original video of her also has 9 million views, though it doesn't claim she was killed. 2601:600:8500:5B1:218:E7FF:FE7D:6AFA (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support. WP:BLP1E A m i t 웃 17:45, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The real story here is not the video itself, but the worldwide publicity that the video created. That publicity is documented in the article and raises the episode well beyond the scope of WP:BLP1E. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.