Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagbe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nagbe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source search suggests he fails WP:CREATIVE and the article is full of promotional material. DrStrauss talk 14:45, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Liberia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete Two sources given in the article are one-paragraph mentions on 154- and 350-page textbooks and the third is a blog post that fails verification. No other evidence of WP:GNG and no indication that this subject qualifies under WP:NPROF. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 10:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.