Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naila Nayem (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. KTC (talk) 12:39, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Naila Nayem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hopefully we can get clearer consensus for this as the past two nominations were not exactly acceptable and the best my searches found were this, this, this and this (Bangladesh Today), this (Dhaka Tribune), this (The Daily Star) and this (New Age) and also Dhaka Courier, Daily Sun, The Independent, Weekly Blitz and News Today all found nothing. Pinging Ibrahim Husain Meraj, Kmzayeem, Nafsadh, Davey2010, Pharaoh of the Wizards, Vinegarymass911, Panyd, Omnipaedista, MusikAnimal and Jubair1985. SwisterTwister talk 23:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not invite me in anything related to Naila Nayem, since I have conflicting interest about her. --nafSadh did say 13:25, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 October 19. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. She is the Kim Kardashian of Bangladesh. She has done some drama, movie, advertisements and music videos. She is notable regardless how one views her. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 03:45, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per these results [1], Seems to meet GNG (Sorry I've just woke up so cant be arsed to add individual news stories, Thanks ST for the ping.). –Davey2010^Talk 07:59, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per Davey re:GNG and if you search for 'নায়লা নাঈম' rather than 'Naila Nayem' you can see that she meets the criteria for notability for entertainers. Unfortunately, I'd love to expand it based on that search but I'm lacking the language skills :( Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 19:15, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete, She appeared in item song in a movie and a single drama. And thats it. She is popular through her facebook page although she does not hold the highest fan base in facebook from Bangladesh, for that I don't think she passes the notability for entertainers criteria. She has not acted any drama or movie. As a editor from Bangladesh, I can vouch for the Deletion of the article. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 16:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Well she's starred in a few films & music videos & Google seems to prove she's notable... –Davey2010^Talk 12:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• She did not acted any movie rather dance item song in a movie (Run Out (film)) and a single drama [2]. Frankly She gained our attention for her bikini poses as a first Bangladeshi model. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 01:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.