Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanda Kumar Jayakumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nanda Kumar Jayakumar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. The article has a mountain of sources, but all of them are either listings of conferences that Jayakumar presented at, interviews with trivial coverage, or citations used to back up claims unrelated to the subject's notability. I was unable to find anything better online. A Scholar search finds Jayakumar to have an h-index of 2 despite a ten year career, which for computer science is far short of WP:NACADEMIC. I briefly nominated this article for CSD G5, but withdrew that as the block appears to have been unrelated to article submissions and the article creator appears to be intent on taking the standard offer in good faith, so it seemed better to go through the standard deletion process for this article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:10, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:10, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:10, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:10, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:10, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:47, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. fails WP:GNG, lacking coverage on reliable sources. Shringhringshring^📞 15:57, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.