Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narasimharao Pet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Eluru. SoWhy 07:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Narasimharao Pet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability issue. Normal residential area in a city. —usernamekiran(talk) 14:27, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and Redirect to Eluru where it can be mentioned as a neighborhood of the city. Without sufficient independent notability, neighborhoods are covered in the larger area. MB 16:06, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and Redirect per User:MB; A WP:BEFORE suggets absolutely no notability independent of the broader area. — O Fortuna ^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 17:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: you probably meant one of the other two. Jupitus Smart 17:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

D'oh! -thanks very much for that- my eyes did indeed deceive me. Thanks for the pointer, — O Fortuna ^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 17:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• @Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi and Jupitus Smart: I didn't understand your comments guys. —usernamekiran(talk)(log) 17:45, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Usernamekiran: It's not important- just that I originally !voted 'per' User:Jupitus Smart, when, actually I meant per User:MB; so I then changed my post and thanked JS for drawing it to my attention. There you go! :) — O Fortuna ^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 17:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: sorry I hadn't seen the history. And it was not long at all lol —usernamekiran(talk)(log) 18:02, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – According to the latest census of India, the above place is a slum with a population of 930 1433, as one can verify from the page no. 856 860 of this district census handbook, which was published by the government of India. But slums are illegal encroachments in India, thereby fail WP:GEOLAND. - NitinMlk (talk) 22:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC) corrected & expanded NitinMlk (talk) 21:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@NitinMlk: Sir, the Narasimharaopet you reffered to is in Tadepalligudem, but NRPet in Eluru is mentioned at page no.860 near 124.—IM3847 (talk) 01:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@IM3847: Thank you, sir, for pointing out my mistake. :) NitinMlk (talk) 21:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.