Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Fakes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Salvio ^giuliano 21:47, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nate Fakes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing sufficient coverage to meet WP:BIO or WP:CREATIVE. The best source cited is a local newspaper which I don't think is much use for determining notability. Beyond that, there is just a brief mention in the NYT and the other sources cited are either not reliable or not of use for determining notability. SmartSE (talk) 17:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and California. SmartSE (talk) 17:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not seeing enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.