Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Cruz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to World of Sport Wrestling. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:47, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan Cruz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:SIGCOV. Working a week long house shows for WWE doesn't make this person notable. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Wrestling, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 13:39, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:05, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• This hurt me a lot. As a fan, I know the importance of Cruz. But as wikipedian, I can't find many sources to support his notability. [1] [2] Looking for sources, I can't find anything focusing around him, most are routine results of events. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:35, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to World of Sport Wrestling where subject is mentioned if SIGCOV cannot be found. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" ^{(work / talk)} 23:19, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.