Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Chisholm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nathaniel Chisholm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, sourcing is atrocious, and the article is written like a resume. I'm surprised this hasn't been deleted earlier. Pyramids09 (talk) 18:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Municipal engineer with too few citations to support academic notability and nothing to support GNG. Likely an autobiography. JoelleJay (talk) 23:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no indication of notability DGG ( talk ) 02:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Legacy page that wouldn't get this far if created today. Standards have changed. Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG MaskedSinger (talk) 13:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.