Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Navigation Award Scheme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that the page does not meet notability requirements. Just Chilling (talk) 17:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

National Navigation Award Scheme

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article, tagged as unreferenced since 2009 without ever seeing a titch of improvement, about an award. As always, awards are not automatically presumed notable just because their self-published websites verify that they exist; they need to show enough reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH. Bearcat (talk) 05:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 07:46, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 07:46, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I spent quite a while searching for coverage in independent reliable sources, but failed to find anything significant enough to meet WP:GNG. I thought for a while that the Royal Institute of Navigation might provide a suitable target for a redirect, but it turns out that it was merely launched at their premises and is an independent charity. And much of the current content still appears to be copy-pasted from its website. --Qwfp (talk) 10:41, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Alowed to stay afloat for far too long. -The Gnome (talk) 14:44, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.