Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural authority

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Natural authority

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was created in 2005 by an editor who has not hung around. There was an addition in 2006 and a further addition in 2013 which adds little of meaning. This appears to have started out as an essay, or at least as the start of an essay, and has not progressed. It is unreferenced, an orphan, and of no discernible (to me) purpose. Emeraude (talk) 13:08, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per Emeraude. Bondegezou (talk) 13:37, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator is correct, delete this. --Ysangkok (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an unsourced essay. Bearian (talk) 22:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.