Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navayuga Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Navayuga Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet the Wikipedia's notability guidelines for corporations, as explained in WP:NCORP and WP:ORGCRIT. Charlie (talk) 16:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Charlie (talk) 16:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:32, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Transportation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep To my eye, the independent coverage cited here does meet the criteria in WP:NCORP. Llajwa (talk) 20:28, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey Llajwa, can you link to the independent coverage please? HighKing⁺⁺ 12:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - clearly a huge company just based on two recent news bits: (a big dam project and a $380 million highway project). That said, almost none of the reference links work. Looks notable but need good refs to prove it.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 23:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - References I find do mention it but only briefly or are part of routine announcements of projects. Some of its affiliated companies are mentioned in other references but not enough in-depth coverage about the main holding company to meet WP:NCORP. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:35, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 17:37, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 13:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.