Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Perwani (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The burden lies with those wanting to Keep an article to either highlight sources in the article or bring new ones into an AFD discussion that demonstrate notability as outlined in Wikipedia's notability standards, in this case, for athletes. Claims of notability that are not supported by reliable sources are discounted. No sources have been brought to this AFD so I'm closing this discussion as Delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Naveen Perwani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable snooker player. Doesn't meet GNG. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 20:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enlighten me on why this is a 'speedy keep'. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:11, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which has nothing to do with WP:GNG Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 00:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't even come close to being notable. He's never even been in the top 128 players of snooker in the world. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 00:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Perwani (2nd nomination), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.