Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navi Bhangu
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Navi Bhangu
- Navi Bhangu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't pass notability guidelines WP:GNG. Extensive sources amount to three articles, all from the Times of India. Article barely has any content, notability of the actor isn't proven in my eyes. st170etalk 15:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Seems to be a notable Indian actor, evidenced by significant coverage in India media AusLondonder (talk) 22:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The actor's claim to notability appears to derive from a single lead role in a soap opera, so I'm not seeing WP:NACTOR being met here. I also note that I couldn't find the subject's name in the articles on two of the shows that appear on the subject's list of television credits. As for the media coverage, I didn't find anything approaching the "significant" coverage that is contemplated by WP:GNG. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete at best instead because although he has a few works, it's still questionable for the necessary better improvements, my searches found nothing outstandingly better. SwisterTwister talk 04:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:GNG. — Music1201 talk 22:14, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.