Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navrajvir Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:13, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Navrajvir Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks Notability. Given Sources are primary. No significant coverage in Independent Sources. Rahmatula786 (talk) 09:40, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Businesspeople, Entertainment, and India. Rahmatula786 (talk) 09:40, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:BIO in any way. No non-primary coverage. (please ping on reply) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:01, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Fails WP:NBIO. The degree of significance of the subject and of role as actor, entrepreneur and influencer is not enough to warrant a page on the subject. RangersRus (talk) 10:56, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:BIO. The article is also seems to be written from a non neutral POV Flyingphoenixchips (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – The subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines because [provide sources or reasons]. Santoshbasa24 (talk) 16:42, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Plz note that your vote won’t be considered authentic if you have created this account after deletion nomination of this article. Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is clearly AI generated as well, the placeholder [] says it. Also @Santoshbasa24, where are those sources or reasons? ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 17:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This vote is suspect. [provide sources or reasons] ... hmmm. Agree with Bunnypranav. It could be AI generated. Mysecretgarden (talk) 08:07, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:38, 28 March 2025 (UTC)3[reply]

AI generated comment, no point in keeping it. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:24, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Navrajvir Singh does not meet Wikipedia’s general notability guideline (WP:GNG) or the specific criteria for biographies (WP:BIO). There are no significant independent, reliable sources providing sustained coverage. Any existing sources are either trivial mentions, primary, or promotional. Since the subject does not qualify for a merge, redirect, or draftification, deletion is the most appropriate course of action."*
Additionally, Singh does not meet the criteria outlined in Wikipedia’s Biographies of Living Persons policy (WP:BIO), which sets specific standards for inclusion. Wikipedia is not a directory of all individuals, and biographical articles must demonstrate clear significance based on independent reporting. If the subject is an athlete, artist, or professional, they must satisfy the notability requirements for their specific field—such as WP:NFOOTY for footballers or WP:ENT for entertainers. Based on the evidence available, Singh does not fulfill any of these thresholds.
Moreover, Wikipedia’s Verifiability policy (WP:V) states that content must be backed by reliable, published sources independent of the subject. If an article primarily relies on self-published sources, social media, press releases, or routine news coverage, it does not meet the standards required for an encyclopedic entry. Even if some sources exist, if they fail to provide substantive analysis or historical significance, they do not contribute to establishing the subject's long-term notability.
Considering these issues, alternative solutions such as redirecting, merging, or draftifying the article are not viable. There is no existing article where merging the content would be appropriate, nor does the subject warrant draftification since the fundamental issue is a lack of independent, verifiable coverage, not just article quality. Since Wikipedia’s purpose is to document topics of lasting encyclopedic interest, an article on Navrajvir Singh does not align with the project’s inclusion criteria.
For these reasons, I strongly support the deletion of this article. It does not meet Wikipedia’s core content policies, and keeping it would set a poor precedent for notability standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4085:AEC6:5C40:609:8204:AA49:31DC (talk) 09:17, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : Not a single reliable source found and contains only blog source and self published sources by the subject that clearly fails WP:GNG. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 19:54, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I think the creator of the article using multiple accounts and Santoshbasa24 is the same person?? Or he isn't aware about WP:Sockpupetry... but i couldn't confirm that he is the same person or not. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 20:05, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – The subject does not have enough news coverage. Linkedin and social media cannot be used. Mysecretgarden (talk) 08:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.