Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nawal Hamadeh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:27, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nawal Hamadeh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing to suggest this has better notability and my searches found nothing to suggest improvement (history suggests a student or someone else related probably started the article), and the best search results I found was here and here. Frankly, she may be somewhat known locally but there's nothing to suggest solid local notability. SwisterTwister talk 03:20, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:17, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:17, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• DGG Care to comment? SwisterTwister talk 06:09, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Admin of small group; relatively trivial awards DGG ( talk ) 06:12, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Come on now. Fails WP:ACADEMIC or any other guideline. This is a resume, and the awards are local ones every district has. --Cagepanes (talk) 07:25, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I'd say something here about my low opinion of the charter school movement, but it wouldn't be germane to the AfD. What is germane is that this type of biography is never going to pass WP:PROF so we need to look to WP:GNG instead, that the paywalled Boston Globe story may or may not be the kind of nontrivial coverage needed for WP:GNG (I can't tell) but if so it's only one, and that the rest looks like local awards and local reports of local awards which to my mind don't count for much in the way of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:00, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.