Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nayak Prasad Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Copyvio of https://sites.google.com/site/nayakprasadsinghji/ NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:54, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nayak Prasad Singh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no reliable sources found. HINDWIKI • CHAT 06:35, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An unreliably-sourced article which makes no claim of the subject's notability. The article text is one of the poorest that I have seen, full of repetitions of blocks of sentences and within sentences, with an excess of exclamation marks, and appearing to be a machine translation: even if notability could be established, WP:TNT would be appropriate as there is nothing here which serves the encyclopaedia. Nor am I seeing a claim to encyclopaedic notability in the article's stream of family history or finding better in searches. Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:33, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: the article demonstrates that translation programs still have a long way to go, and I'm still not sure why the creator considers the subject to be notable (since we don't have a category WP:NFARMER) - but it definitely fails WP:NOTOBITUARY. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 11:02, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A complete fail of WP:GNG. Shellwood (talk) 14:43, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.