Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neethi Taylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Coolabahapple (talk) 05:05, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neethi Taylor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason: Unclear notability and inadequate sources. Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion: (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niti Taylor (2nd nomination); article name change may be to evade this. Verbcatcher (talk) 04:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Verbcatcher (talk) 04:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Verbcatcher (talk) 04:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Verbcatcher (talk) 05:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Hmm... according to this she seems to likely pass notability guidelines. She played a major role in Kaisi Yeh Yaariaan and was the main character for the first two seasons and declined to go back because she was going to be in Ghulaam, where it looks like she's also one of the major characters per articles like this one. I'm finding some reviews for Pelli Pustakam, although the article links to a 1991 film by the same name. I'll look for more, but it seems like she would pass now. As far as this being a way to circumvent the prior deletion, it's possible considering that the lead sentence uses the other spelling. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to assume good faith and say that it's not an attempt to circumvent the AfD, given that there's press out there that refers to her as Neethi and by other spellings. It's not uncommon for this to happen during translation and they realized the most common spelling at some point prior in the editing process. I also note the first version of the article had her birth name as Neethi, so they might have created it under her birth name. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Upon looking for sources, I found enough to show that she passes notability guidelines pretty firmly. She has a major role in two notable TV series, one of which was the main character, and has been the main character in two films. Both of the two films pass notability guidelines per NFILM, even though one doesn't have an article just yet. She's a main character in a third film, but I haven't researched that one well enough yet to know if it would pass NFILM. In any case, she passes NACTOR. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:22, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've created an article for one of the two films without an article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Thanks for investigating this and for improving the article. As the nominator I am not now pressing for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:58, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.