Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NetSPI (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. And salt. Sandstein 18:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
NetSPI
- NetSPI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find any in-depth coverage more than quotes from employees, passing mentions and press releases. Already been deleted twice at AFD. Time to WP:SALT? Toddst1 (talk) 19:33, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Despite a history showing editors putting effort into removing promotional content, what is left is showing just a company going about its business. They have some local coverage,as per the reference in the article, but beyond that I am seeing only passing mentions and routine announcements, insufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 08:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:51, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:51, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: no claims to notability, no references other than one link to a local news article. My own searches found only the company website and the expected trade listings, job postings, etc. nothing to establish notability. Seems like a slam-dunk delete. Lithopsian (talk) 09:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:58, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:58, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and SALT. Article is SPAM. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:15, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.