Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Created by banned user Orangemoody. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:00, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Netent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm unable to find any substantial, independent coverage about this company to demonstrate that WP:CORP can be met. SmartSE (talk) 14:56, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 15:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 15:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 15:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as the current article and its sourcing is questionable, that is, unless better and convincing coverage including Swedish can be found. SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify. At least this is a company that does something I feel can understand (unlike those management consultant somethings), and it is actually quite successful in its area. A number of Swedish sources can be found, especially by searching for them by their previous longer name, "Net Entertainment" (it also gets quite a few false positives, but I find some decent articles when doing a focused search on Swedish business news sources). I don't have time to look at it right now, but I'd suggest moving this to Draft:Netent. --Hegvald (talk) 15:00, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Fails WP:NCORP and WP:SIGCOV.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:08, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.