Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netgables

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Netgables

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From what I can tell, this is a clear fail of WP:NCORP. The references provided are mostly about one of the products of Netgables (Saralweb), and personal profiles of its investors. I find no substantial coverage of Netgables itself, hence delete. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment No opinion on the sources yet but I just removed two unambiguously promotional sections from this article since the AfD was kicked off. Also note that Saralweb redirects to Netgables, so if there is enough coverage of the product maybe it would be better to move the article over the redirect. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  22:13, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm open to a redirect/refocus to Saralweb, but new coverage seem extremely thin. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a smallish private company; no indications of notability or significance. Sources do not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:01, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. References as per op, fail WP:CORPDEPTH. -- HighKing⁺⁺12:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.