Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nethone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nethone

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable business. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 11:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 11:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete no substantive sources. Some press-release-level coverage in fintech blogs (e.g. "Bankless Times" in the article) but nothing substantive, RS or both - David Gerard (talk) 13:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NCOMPANY. Spam. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:28, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Having seen the word 'leveraging' in the contested deletion message, I'm very inclined to think this is spam... Peridon (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROMO and lack of RS; no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:37, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.