Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neville Grech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 14:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neville Grech

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to currently be a postdoc/lecturer, with some early career awards and a decent amount of citations, but don't think meets WP:NPROF. Co-founded a company (Dedaub), but I didn't see enough independant coverage to meet WP:GNG. Seems like WP:TOOSOON. Kj cheetham (talk) 14:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Computing. Kj cheetham (talk) 14:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malta-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:58, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. This is a high-citation field, so even though he has three publications with triple-digit citations on Google Scholar [1], I think that is not enough to make a convincing case for WP:PROF#C1. Additionally, they are all on cryptocurrency-related projects, so we should maybe also consider WP:NCRYPTO, which sets a higher bar for notability in this area (although not specifically for biographies). None of the rest rises to the level of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete cause I don't think this passes PROF. In addition, I think this is a paid creation. Kj cheetham, did you see Mihir Bhatt? Drmies (talk) 17:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How can we proceed with the deletion 78.133.60.29 (talk) 21:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A patrolling admin will process it after 7 days from this discussion being opened. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.