Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nevosoft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nevosoft

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN game developer - fails WP:NORG. UtherSRG (talk) 16:09, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Business, Companies, and Russia. UtherSRG (talk) 16:09, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Obvious advertising here. If it somehow isn't obvious advertising, take this as a Strong Delete. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:09, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I cannot find anything remotely close to meeting WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:17, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only references appear to either discuss the games or only mention the company in passing, references fail GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺21:09, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete verges on WP:ADVERT, and fails WP:NCORP. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:53, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Appears to be non-notable and possible an advert. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 18:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I ended up googling this company and reading this Wikipedia article. Incidentally I see it has been marked for deletion recently. The whole reason I searched for this company is from watching a Russian streamer play a popular for him childhood game "Super Cow". It seems the company has been active since 2002, and much of it's claimed success from online articles seems to be from before 2010. It is very likely the case that the company has fallen off in modern times but was popular in the Russian market between 2002 - 2012. As of the time of writing this vote I did not read the WP articles cited by other users in detail, but a quick search leads me to believe the company was relatively popular for it's time in it's market, and as such I believe it is deserving of an article. NoN33d4UserNames (talk) 07:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@NoN33d4UserNames: This is a discussion, not a vote. Please read that link, as well as WP:ITEXISTS, to understand how your keep !vote has no bearing. What matters most in retaining an article is whether is passes a reasonable test for notability, which has a particular meaning with regards to an encyclopedia article, so you should read that link as well. The links provided in the delete !votes above are pointing to specific instances of our notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG Karnataka (talk) 21:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.