Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewEdge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NewEdge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With this being still questionable for WP:CORP and WP:GNG, I nearly PRODed, my searches have found nothing better at all and there's simply nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 04:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is hardly any independent coverage, wouldn't pass GNG. Note that searching for NewEdge returns multiple false positives which are about Newedge Group. In addition, the state of the article indicates it is better to WP:TNT it. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - hardly any reliable sources. The state of the article is very bad, and really should be WP:TNT'd. Tom29739 ^[talk] 21:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.