Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Freudenberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:55, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

[reply]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Nicholas Freudenberg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient evidence of notability. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:40, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 01:58, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 01:58, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

keep Distiguished professors at reputable schools are automatically notable under WP:NACADEMIC#5. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 05:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 05:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Ah yes good point. Will withdraw.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:55, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.