Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightmist (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:27, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nightmist

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources or Google Books search. Previously deleted at AfD. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 21:38, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 21:38, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Gave it a good go but can't find any reliable sources that cover this. The best result I got was an entry in The Mud Connector, which merely confirms that it exists. Though the article says it's popular, that's not enough to establish notability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:01, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The best I've found is this. Hardly notable. Adam9007 (talk) 01:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.