Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nisha JamVwal (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. and salt Missvain (talk) 07:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nisha JamVwal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable. Article was nominated for deletion earlier, concerns which were expressed last time are the same as now. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:53, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Salt - Like the last 2 times this has been AFD'd and deleted... No evidence of notability!, Seeing as it's been created and deleted twice this should be Salted. –Davey2010^Talk 21:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been created with all reference link attached to it and all articles suggest this is a notable person. Please feel free to google the person as-well.Cpavlankar (talk) 21:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article has one source which is to a Wikipedia article so technically it's not a source, The only thing this article suggests is that she's not a notable person at all, I have googled her and like yourself I've found nothing, No Sources = No article. –Davey2010^Talk 22:55, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

check reference links its updated Cpavlankar (talk) 09:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of the sources in the article is reliable, so it fails WP:GNG. It doesn't make any specific claims of notability either.--Antigng (talk) 15:40, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The article is the exact same as it was during the previous AfD. Unless improved, it fails a plethora of policies. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I went thru the soucres, the creator added, majority are from Youtube, one is a Wiki article which makes ZERO mention of the subject, one is Shiksha.com, Zoominfo, not reliable and then there is the blog. Fails WP:GNG.. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:17, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Rsrikanth05: -Any reason it was not G4'ed? Last concern was notability but G4 was applied, it still is eligible for G4. Well aside speedy, I feel like BEFORE was not performed in this particular case. I did a simple search using INDAFD search engines, and found these, tons of them, -Times of India, Times of India-2, Times of India-3, Times of India-4, DNA India, DNA India-2, DNA India-3, Economic Times, iDiva.com, -MORE. Are you going to withdraw your nomination now? Or expand deletion rationale to combine TNT? Anupmehra -Let's talk! 04:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Query: Are "Nisha JamVwal" (no space) and "Nisha Jam Vwal" (space) the same person? Is she an "interior-architect" or a fashion designer or both? Pax 00:42, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think, yes. Both are same. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:52, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.