Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nonfatal bear attacks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bear attack. There is clearly consensus that the content of the article is unsuitable, and since none of the delete !votes were opposed to redirecting it to Bear attack, which does mention that some attacks are non-fatal, I'm redirecting it there. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nonfatal bear attacks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Considering the attacks were not fatal, I don't see this as notable. Meatsgains (talk) 01:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article is just silly as written. Power~enwiki (talk) 01:54, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:LISTCRUFT. Ajf773 (talk) 03:04, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The items are not talked or listed as a set in notable sources, so fails WP:LISTN. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 08:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We have a perfectly good article Bear attack and anything important could be merged there, but there isn't anything needing merging. This looks like a WP:CONTENTFORK or WP:POVFORK, but I don't want to speculate further as to the creator's motives. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:48, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as simple WP:LISTCRUFT. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 12:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:LISTCRUFT. --CutOffTies (talk) 23:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete silly, spurious, non-encyclopedic trivia. ValarianB (talk) 14:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: this WP:LISTCRUFT. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Indiscriminate listcruft. Also, it doesn't include the time a Scottish co-worker of mine fought off a bear with an umbrella while hiking in Japan. --Calton | Talk 12:38, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.