Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NordLayer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 05:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NordLayer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unambiguos advertisement of the product of a non-notable company. Nowhere meets WP:GNG. Lacking WP:SIGCOV. Jeni Wolf (talk) 05:50, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, and United States of America. Jeni Wolf (talk) 05:50, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to NordVPN: The existing paragraph under NordVPN#History provides adequate coverage of NordVPN Teams / NordLayer. Redirecting as an WP:ATD retains the history should NordLayer ever become notable in itself. AllyD (talk) 07:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:45, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and improve. Seems a notable service as it has received a lot of coverage during COVID-19 pandemic (the rise correlates with the rise of remote work). In addition, some notable publications like PCMag and TechRadar have published detailed reviews about this ([1], [2]). ZDNet has covered it to a reasonable extent [3]. Alex Windels (talk) 13:48, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I would lean keep here. I think sources are enough here for us to write a decent neutral article. The tone of the current version should be addressed. I would also like to note that about 80 percent of the coverage about the topic is under the title "NordVPN Teams". Few books have briefly discussed it too. Cheers, 27.33.164.186 (talk) 00:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:44, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the reviews in reliable sources. Meets GNG. -- Mike 🗩 17:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Its a product/service so WP:NCORP applies. There are sufficient in-depth third party reviews to meet the criteria for establishing notability, passes NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:51, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.