Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norebo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. One recreation several years later wouldn't typically lead to salting, so holding off on that. RL0919 (talk) 17:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Norebo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability. It seems to have previously been deleted, but redirecting it seems to have been rejected. TTN (talk) 13:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 13:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 13:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This appears to be yet another D&D article that was already deleted per consensus at a prior AFD, recreated as a redirect, and then restored back to an article by an IP when people were no longer watching. Nothing has changed since the prior AFD, and there is no material from reliable, secondary sources discussing this fictional deity, thus failing the WP:GNG. Rorshacma (talk) 16:06, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lacks sufficient RS to pass the GNG. Chetsford (talk) 02:18, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt per the previous AfD. The sourcing in the article has not improved at all. Not a very active user (talk) 05:49, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.