Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nork Deddog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nork Deddog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:FANCRUFT created in place of a redirect to Warhammer 40k from which this is a character. No citations and no possible claim to notability. I doubt there is even much value in merging this, but I don't know the area that well. FalconK (talk) 05:47, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:58, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This unsourced article has existed for 15 years. While close to the record, it is not quite the record for long standing unsourced cruft. To put everything in perspective it was apparanently not until 2006 that any attempts to create a notability guideline for fictional characters were undertaken.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:59, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, unreferenced fancruft that fails WP:GNG and WP:PLOT, he is not even mentioned at List of Warhammer Fantasy characters, which is a testament to his irrelevance and makes a redirect useless. Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.