Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear RAT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 01:56, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear RAT

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unreferenced software (trojan) article of unclear notability, created by an SPA as possibly promotional. A search turned up download sites and incidental mentions, but no significant RS coverage of this software. Dialectric (talk) 06:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 06:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's even hardly much here much less to suggest noticeably notability and improvement. Notifying past users Ched and JJMC89. SwisterTwister talk 06:45, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*Strong Keep It is a trojan, which by it's nature is not know by many people, only a few who created it, and the many who only know it as a virus. We don't really have a lot of these type of articles on Wikipedia, very few and in this instance, we really needed them. It's pure encyclopedia knowledge. I'll add a reference. scope_creep 11:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Delete No mention in Cert, McAfee or Symantec databases. scope_creep 12:19, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the ping SwisterTwister. I don't have strong feelings either way. — Ched : ? 19:08, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.