Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nyx stream

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to draft. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:41, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nyx stream

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON, certainly fails WP:NASTRO and probably WP:GNG. One preprint paper, no popular coverage, wouldn't even be notable if the preprint is peer-reviewed. Telling that it is an orphan. Lithopsian (talk) 19:41, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It sounded important to me, worthy of a harmless stub article. I agree it is important to get news coverage. Tom Ruen (talk) 19:49, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

draftify A new stellar stream sounds important. But... There seems to be no one citing that preprint, it is just so new. So I would suggest putting this back to a draft state to await some secondary overage, or other papers appearing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify or Userfy — there's nothing intrinsically wrong with the content, really, but one not-yet-reviewed arXiv item isn't enough to build an article upon. When the paper gets officially published and/or attracts some citations and commentary, then mention can be made at, e.g., List of stellar streams (depending on how much there is to say about it, it might not need a stand-alone article). XOR'easter (talk) 20:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify The subject is interesting but the article, right now, does not give the reader much information. So I agree with the above that it needs additional work, but not to be deleted. Alex-h (talk) 10:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.