Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Observado.org (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 04:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Observado.org (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This website is non-notable per WP:WEB. SL93 (talk) 23:10, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: No significant coverage was presented in the previous AfD which closed as no consensus. SL93 (talk) 23:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No sign of significant coverage. The fact that it has been referenced a few times is of course not enough to satisfy WP:GNG. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 16:54, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom for failing WP:WEB, it's a non-notable website run by a non-notable organization. Ifnord (talk) 22:34, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.