Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Colours

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 01:13, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Old Colours

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not an obviously notable band. I declined a speedy because they have a mention in The Swindon Advertiser, which mentions one track was picked up by a US syncing company and expected to (my emphasis) appear in a drama series. Unfortunately, the cynic in me suggests this was done because it is more economic to pick up background / incidental music by an unsigned band than having to pay royalties to a signed one. They've also appeared on BBC 6 Music, but so have many many other non-notable bands - again because it's cheaper to put unsigned acts on due to no royalty payments. I can't find any other news or book hits, or anything else in reliable sources. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not yet notable enough for an article. If they appeared on 6 Music it's because someone there likes them and nothing to do with not paying royalties. --Michig (talk) 20:54, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:32, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:32, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seem's non-notable, but I agree that that source excludes speedy-delete. Benboy00 (talk) 18:22, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I cannot find any evidence that this band meets the guidelines for inclusion at WP:BAND or the WP:GNG. — sparklism ^hey! 11:49, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.