Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksandr Rudenko (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ . ✗plicit 23:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oleksandr Rudenko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Oleksandr Rudenko

Association football player who does not satisfy general notability. This article was draftified once, and has been moved back to article space with minimal improvement. An article should speak for itself, but this article says nothing about significant coverage of the subject. The references appear to be database entries, and a reader should not be expected to check the references to see whether third parties have written about the subject. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Ukraine. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - creator has WP:REFBOMBed 18 refs from stats sites and non-independent sources and 5 ELs to try to give an illusion that the subject is notable but he still fails WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG as he did last time we discussed him. Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:24, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - creator WP:REFBOMBing the article with sources that do not meet IS RS SIGCOV demonstrates the lack of sources showing notability for subject.  // Timothy :: talk  06:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 11:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - significant use of WP:REFBOMBing from non-reliable stats sites. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 19:52, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.