Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olive Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 04:45, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Olive Films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTCATALOG; WP:INDISCRIMINATE. No evidence of notability. --woodensuperman 12:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:23, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- pure and overly extensive WP:CATALOG and no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:47, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -- useful resource for a well known and established boutique blu-ray label. Cagwinn (talk) 04:49, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per nom. Such a enormously large list, from the two references for Better Off Ted and Napoleon Dynamite, means there is not just a lack of notability there is an abundance of original research and synthesis. Being "useful" does not provide an exemption. Otr500 (talk) 13:30, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -- I agree with Caqwinn, useful resource for a well known and established boutique blu-ray label.Filmman3000 (talk) 03:16, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No indications of notability, no references. Impressive catalog of movies but notability isn't inheritied and we need independent sources. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.